Commentary on Second Obama-Romney Debate
By: Prof. Elvio Gutiérrez Santana

1. The way Romney talks and expresses inconsistencies denotes the ideas and lack of knowledge of how to make the ideas.

2. Obama is sure, what he is doing and he knows where to go.

3. In the discussion, it became clear that Obama has cut oil entrepreneurs privileges that Romney wants back.

4. In that sense, the process of moving towards clean energy would be faster under Obama than Romney and that is favorable for the World Economy.

5. Romney´s Inconsistencies of cutting taxes, supposedly to the middle class, but that covers all sectors where the wealthiest will benefit from the argument that these would generate more jobs. In addition to thereby reduce the deficit is a fallacy demagogic.

6. Obama´s calculation of the eight billion deficit would generate Romney, demonstrates the incoherence of Romney's Plan and its similarity to the Bush administration.

7. On the Obama national security policy was clear successes in capturing Bin Laden, the return of troops from Iraq. Security with Peace.

8. Romney implicitly leaves the interest of Republicans to intervene in Egypt and Syria and Iran. High probability of new wars.

9. Romney erred in saying that he wanted to bring a cheap manufacturing and compete with China. This is impossible.

10. Obama is coherent and consistent in stating that he wants to improve education and increase opportunities to get better jobs.

11. The issue of women's equality was best treated by Obama than Romney.

12. Overall Obama knows what he is doing, where you are going, fulfilled to the extent that the Republicans in Congress have allowed what have failed for lack of support from Republicans in Congress.

13. Romney is a demagogic speech that seems attractive because the alleged reduction of the tax burden with fiscal reduction, but in practice it is not possible to carry out, but for his successful career seems attractive to a portion of the population